Skip to content

Live From Copenhagen: Ecosystems everywhere demand REDDER while COP gets hotter

December 17, 2009

Sorry, this is a bit late,  I have to catch my flight tomorrow and like the rest of Copenhagen I got caught in the snow tonight.  Anyway I had a very eventful day outside of the COP.

I finally got to the Copenhagen film festival and saw two fantastic films.  I would like to screen both of these films and several others at Georgia Tech in the Spring.  The first, called Hope in a Changing Climate, showed the power of restoring soil structure and natural vegetation.  In China and Ethiopia degraded desert wastelands were converted to green oases in a matter of a mere fifteen years, by replanting trees, changing agriculture and grazing behavior.  Vegetation is 90% water and prevents soil erosion, and organic soil stores 3 time more carbon than vegetation.  If REDD succeeds, the restoration of millions of hectares of land could perhaps be tied in through an extension program Reducing Emissions from Degradation, Deforestation and Ecosystem Restoration (REDDER).  Sounds long, but trust me it is the next big thing! 😉  After the film, director John D. Liu shared some profound conclusions, ‘We have to think beyond our localities, a restored ecosystem anywhere is a benefit to all of humanity.  We need to have a species consciousness and act in the interest of everyone on the planet.  This is the only way to prevent global catastrophe.’   The second, a film called Green by Patrick Rouxel, traced the destruction of forests in Indonesia for palm oil production.  There is no dialogue in the film, only a mourning hymn in the background.  Seeing the destruction of these forests and the species that depend on them puts in perspective what is at stake.  Perhaps what is even sadder is the reminder that most of the industrialized world was once covered with forests.  They are hundreds of years gone and our collective consciousness doesn’t even remember them.

My guest bloggers didn’t make it to the actual blog (this is hard work folks!), but I had dinner with two of them  (Harro Van Assault, Vrije University Amsterdam and Kanako Morita, Tokyo Institute of Technology) and they shared some really good insights and news from the inside.  Connie Hedregaard stepped down from her position as COP President.  This is unusual and unfortunate for a number of reasons.  One, it signals (as though everything else didn’t) that things are not going well and two, she is one of the few (if not the only) woman to ever make it to that position.  A big message of this conference is that we need to involve the work of women, particularly in developing countries.  One of the delegates even commented on Hedregaard’s Presidency, the great work that she was doing and the strong signal it sent to women all over the world.  The official reason for her to step down was that someone more official (Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen) was able and willing to lead the HLS, but this is not how other COPs have operated.  There is also the fact that the Danish ministry lost credibility with the leaked Danish draft text, which particularly upset the G77.  But I can’t help but wonder if she would have been so easily pushed aside if she were not a woman.  I am not sure that Prime Minister Rasmussen is going to do anything different in her place and he doesn’t bring any continuity to the process.  Meanwhile, outside, there was a NGO walk-out where badge members left the conference to protest the fact that numbers have become so restricted.  A Dutch business leader decided to join the demonstration and was subsequently trapped outside without his coat.  The protesters were not allowed back in…

During the plenary there were two speeches that caught everyone’s attention, one by Hugo Chavez, a 10 minute rant about the failure of capitalism (would really like to see this).  The second a speech by Robert Mugabe, which underscored the importance of the environment.  His new-found environmental ethic made most viewers uncomfortable, especially given his record on human rights and rule of law.   May be able to get more details tomorrow.   If not, I will sign off at the end of the conference with some analysis of the final result from Atlanta.   Thank you to everyone for reading!

Cheers,

Janelle Knox-Hayes

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Anders permalink
    December 17, 2009 10:15 AM

    This morning there were reports in the Danish media that the Prime Minister’s Offices was more or less paralysed after China and G77 had refused to let them table a compromise text today. First rumours had it that the Danish precidency was consequently giving up on a deal, now it is interpreted as a tactical ultimatum. A few minutes ago it was announced that the PM would ask Connie Hedegaard to reclaim the chair of the negotiations while he would go bilateral during the day.

  2. sppatech permalink
    December 17, 2009 12:55 PM

    Janelle, from what I’ve been reading from you and other sources, it sounds like much of the variance can be explained by the lack of what is described as global conscience, collective consciousness, etc. It’s almost too simple to say that we don’t have decisionmaking institutions that have both the authority and the incentives to adjust from local, short-term thinking to the kind of perspective. When you get back, maybe we can spend a lunch (or more) discussing this; I’d love to hear what you’re observing about institutional behavior and the possibilities for change.

    What you say about Rouxel’s film reminds me of the now-very-old film Koyaanisqatsi (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sps6C9u7ras). I wonder about the absence of any pop culture messaging on climate change — where are the protests, the songs (okay, maybe not Philip Glass…), the youthful outrage about the likely degrading of their future? I’m not surprised that the corporations and political institutions are short-sighted, but what about the college students?

    — Richard

    • Doug permalink
      December 19, 2009 6:56 AM

      A few weeks ago, someone described the upcoming Copenhagen meetings as the kind of event and process that is well worn. Nothing too remarkable or novel. (Notwithstanding the passionate pleas from the advocates to the contrary) This, he wrote, is international trade negotiations at the highest level. And we’ve been doing intermittently that for decades. And you can see how that has played out in practice. Perhaps it’s time for a new decision-making institution, rather than the well-worn one we’ve been using. (And therein lies a meta-collective action problem?)

  3. December 17, 2009 11:09 PM

    Wow…thanks for the update Anders. Very interesting politicking indeed! I wonder if this will push forward some progress. The news seems fairly optimistic.

    Thanks for the insights Richard!! Let’s discuss these over lunch. The young people are pretty taciturn these days!

    Cheers,

    Janelle

  4. May 9, 2013 7:14 PM

    Thanks for a marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.
    I will always bookmark your blog and will come back from now on.
    I want to encourage you to continue your great
    posts, have a nice holiday weekend!

Leave a comment